Whole grains are one of the few foods in nutrition science with genuinely large scale, long term evidence behind them, which makes them a useful place to start when talking about blood sugar with any client.
A dose response meta analysis published in the BMJ in 2016 by Aune and colleagues pooled forty five studies covering more than seven hundred thousand people and found that higher whole grain intake was associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and death from diabetes and all causes. The protective effect increased with intake up to around ninety grams a day of fresh whole grains before levelling off.
A separate meta analysis by the same research group, published in the European Journal of Epidemiology in 2013, looked specifically at type 2 diabetes and found an inverse dose response relationship between whole grain intake and diabetes risk, while refined grain intake showed no such benefit and in some analyses moved in the opposite direction.
The mechanism is thought to centre on the intact fibre and bran layer of whole grains, which slows gastric emptying and the rate of glucose absorption, along with a broader nutrient profile that includes magnesium, a mineral involved in insulin signalling. This is a useful distinction to make with clients: the benefit sits specifically with the whole grain, meaning the bran and germ remain intact, rather than with grain based foods generally.
In practical terms, this supports choices such as whole grain sourdough over white bread, farro or barley over refined pasta, and oats over refined breakfast cereals, all of which are already staples of a traditional Mediterranean way of eating.
References
- 1. Aune D, Keum N, Giovannucci E, et al. Whole grain consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all cause and cause specific mortality: systematic review and dose response meta analysis of prospective studies. BMJ. 2016;353:i2716.
- 2. Aune D, Norat T, Romundstad P, Vatten LJ. Whole grain and refined grain consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta analysis of cohort studies. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2013;28(11):845 to 858.















